December 2015

Juliet:
“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.”

Romeo and Juliet (II, ii, 1-2)

________________________________

Juliet was wrong. What something is called has a large influence on how people view it. Republicans understand this well. After the decimation wrought on 9/11 the fight was taken to the terrorists. Abroad, with the invasion of Afghanistan. And at home, with a surveillance law called in full: “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001″ better known by the acronym “USA PATRIOT Act”.

photoOnly the hardcore are going to look past the name to ask what the damn thing actually legalized. The Act had overwhelming support. Only one Senator had the nerve to vote against it – well played Russ Feingold. Had the bill not borne such a tortuous name – had it indeed been identified by its number ‘PUBLIC LAW 107–56’ – it would have had a better chance of suffering reasoned scrutiny.

Instead, the US Congress easily slashed the civil rights of Americans.

‘Creationism’ is an honest name. The philosophy promotes the idea that God created the earth, and its incumbents, as described in Genesis. Then Courts rejected attempts to shoe-horn this pseudoscience into science class. So its adherents – uninterested in facts, but very interested in propaganda – changed its name to ‘Intelligent Design’. Fortunately, courts have seen through the flimflam and rejected its inclusion in science class where the school boards have been sued.

Which brings us to religious freedom and so called ‘Religious Freedom Restoration acts’ or RFRAs. They have become popular at the state level ever since the Supreme Court decided that gays have the right to marry. Sanctimonious state legislators claim they are doing nothing more than the federal government did in its 1993 RFRA – which Bill Clinton signed into law (i.e., the libtards are hypocrites for decrying state RFRAs).

Except these new state RFRAs do not model the federal effort. The inspiration for that was the arbitrary denial to Native American of the use of hallucinogenics in their religious ceremonies. The Act barred the government from interfering with religious freedom. The state laws, on the other hand, allow individuals to discriminate. They would be more honestly called ‘Bigotry Freedom Restoration acts’.

RFRAs are further misleading in that no state has ever passed one with the idea of protecting any religious freedom other than that of Christians. When Muslims planned to build an Islamic cultural center in the same general neighborhood as the World Trade Center, Muslim religious freedom was greeted with a general ‘fuck that’.

Which brings us back to creationists. They have glommed on to this ‘freedom’ misdirection. They now protest that the reject of their superstition in science class is a denial of their ‘academic freedom’. The leader in this effort is the ‘Discovery Institute” – which, by now you’ll know, would be more accurately called the ‘We Have no Interest in Discovery Institute’. They publish manifestly fact-free ‘science’ textbooks to supplement the teaching of evolution. And so the band plays on.

But enough about religion, let’s talk money. Elizabeth Warren, now a Senator (D-MA), first came to prominence for her development and promotion of the ‘Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’. This agency is a detestation to bankers as it limits the ability of financial institutions to rip off their customers. As might be imagined, these pirates masquerading as reliable financial managers were not amused.

All manner of pressure and money was directed at their Congressional poodles to defang this force for good. Even the morally crippled were drafted into the fight. Newt Gingrich is now a shill for an industry group called – and here comes the chutzpah – ‘the US Consumer Coalition’. How many consumers does it represent? None, of course. Who does it represent? We don’t know; it doesn’t have to disclose its donors.

Big business interests are often represented by groups with names designed to obfuscate their pay-masters. When New York tried to implement a sales tax on sugary drinks, there was wailing and gnashing of teeth in the executive suites (appropriate homophone) of the companies profiting off obesity. Quickly entering the debate was ‘New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes’ – the brainchild of the American Beverage Association.

Clever, really. No one wants to pay taxes. But if the ABA were interested in the pocketbook of the New York consumer, they would stop selling crap and tell the consumer to drink tap water (the free kind – not the bottled, for a price).

George Orwell’s genius in ‘1984’ was to lay bare the techniques used by authority to keep the masses subjugated, while the masses think authority is doing them a favor. Foreign enemies, domestic boogie-men, a perpetual state of fear and ownership of history and the language are useful. Republicans have learned the lessons well.

 

{ 0 comments }

Christmas Trivia

December 25, 2015

“In the old days, it was not called the Holiday Season; the Christians called it ‘Christmas’ and went to church; the Jews called it ‘Hanukkah’ and went to synagogue; the atheists went to parties and drank. People passing each other on the street would say ‘Merry Christmas!’ or ‘Happy Hanukkah!’ or (to the atheists) ‘Look […]

Read the full article →

Really? – 12.22.15 – More Trump Misogyny; Cruz Gallops up the Backstretch; Is the GOP Establishment on the Ropes?

December 22, 2015

“When I look at myself in the first grade and I look at myself now, I’m basically the same. The temperament is not that different.” – Donald Trump. Donald Trump is playing an odd game. He seems to be calculating how to win, while appealing to the narrowest possible segment of the electorate. Take women. […]

Read the full article →

Really? – 12.21.15 – DWS Boosts Her BFF Hillary; Trump’s Bromance; Fiorina’s Howler

December 20, 2015

I have been thinking that I would make a proposition to my Republican friends… that if they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them. – Adlai E. Stevenson The Democrats had a debate yesterday. Nobody watched. It was the second of three debates scheduled for a weekend night. Why […]

Read the full article →

Really? -12.19.15 – Donald Holds Vlad’s Hand; Rubio Plays Hooky; DWS Holds Hill’s Hand.

December 19, 2015

“For never was a story of more woe than this of Juliet and her Romeo.” ― William Shakespeare Donald Trump is so pathetically eager to be liked that when Vladimir Putin said something pretty about him, he replied in kind – calling Putin a ‘strong leader’. It’s generally considered bad form to give enemy leaders an […]

Read the full article →

Really? 12.17.15. Foreigners, God, and Hypocrisy.

December 17, 2015

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) illustrates the otherworldly logic of politics. He larded the $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill with pork for his home state – but has also said that he will vote against it. Why? Because he wants it include language barring Syrian refugees. Foreigners being a no-no to Alabamans. Alabama is also home […]

Read the full article →

Really? Carly Fiorina, a Liar with Odd Ads; Darth Vader and the Politics of Racism.

December 16, 2015

“In thy foul throat thou liest.” ― William Shakespeare, Richard III Carly Fiorina lies – as do most politicians. But where Carly goes wrong is in the specificity of her lies. It’s too easy to check her veracity. Good politicians say things like, “homosexuals have an agenda”, “all Muslims might be terrorists”, “global warming is […]

Read the full article →

You Won’t Die in a Terrorist Attack. Americans Don’t Understand Odds.

December 12, 2015

More Republicans (50% vs. 45%) are worried about dying in a terrorist attack than they are about dying from gun violence. Statistically, that’s absurd. Even in 2001, the number of Americans killed by terrorism didn’t come close to the number of Americans murdered by guns. The terror attacks of 9/11 killed 2,689 Americans (excluded are non-citizens); homicide by gun […]

Read the full article →

George Orwell’s Review of Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’

December 10, 2015

In March 1940, George Orwell published a review of Adolph Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’. For many reasons – and despite the Nazi allusions tossed around – America in 2015 is not the same as 1930s Germany. But the review points out some interestig comparisons. To read it click here: Orwell’s review of ‘Mein Kampf’.

Read the full article →