April 2012

Is sex a sin?

by Pitt Griffin on April 30, 2012 · 0 comments

in Politics, Religion

Religion tells us which sex is moral and which isn’t. But there is no one standard. Some fundamentalists believe that raped women should be stoned to death. Some liberals see sex as a pleasure to be enjoyed by any consenting adults. So where to draw the line? Or should there even be a line drawn?

To many followers of the Abrahamic faiths the Bible holds the answer. But difficulties arise as different people have very different interpretations of the text. Orthodox Jews reduce sex to a mechanical exercise to produce children. Fundamentalist Christians increasingly celebrate marital sex as a God given joy. It seems that sexual morality is in the eye of the beholder.

Criminal and Civil law provides the rules that a society imposes on itself to promote coexistence. Moral codes are the rules that interest groups would impose upon everyone else to conform our behavior to their taste. Authority for these codes comes from their interpretation of what some supreme being supposedly told someone years ago.

Consistency in interpretation might grant authority, but today’s moral judges cherry pick which sins are still relevant and which we can safely ignore. Consider two verses from Leviticus – 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death.” This oft quoted verse is used to call gay sex a sin. But then what of 20:9 For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death.” Why has Congress not passed a “Defense of Parents Act” (DOPA)? Why has no state referendum addressed the issue? Why is there no campaign to make parent cursing unconstitutional?

Biblical sexual morality does not fit with today’s philosophy of granting equality to women. Biblical sex rules assumed that sex was a male prerogative and women should just lie there and take it.

The moral history of sex within marriage is quite horrifying. Women were not granted any sexual rights after marriage, it was acceptable for a man to demand sex from his wife and if she withheld it he was morally (and legally) entitled to take her by force. No man was prosecuted for raping his wife, if they lived together, until 1978 and it wasn’t until 1993 that North Carolina became the last state to allow for marital rape. Senator Bob Wilson CA summed up a prevailing moral philosophy. “If you cannot rape your wife who can you rape”.

And yet people who saw no sin in marital rape, would piously intone on the immorality of unmarried or gay sex. It calls into question how they can claim any moral authority.

Churches are no better than people.  The Roman Catholic Church in particular presumed to lecture on premarital sex while condoning child rape, which surely is a sin. This was not a case of a few bad apples. This was a systemic, international, institutionally mandated and approved cover-up of the basest of crimes. It makes the Catholic Church a useless arbiter of sexual morality. If you chose to follow your religion’s proscriptions on sex so be it, but you can only chose for yourself.

If religion provides no moral basis for calling sex a sin, is there a legal basis to discriminate against certain types of sex. Yes and no? Yes, we can make illegal sex with minors, sex with animals and non-consensual sex. No, there is no basis for constraints on sex between consenting adults, in their own homes, with the curtains closed.

A true conservative should support the right of an individual to have any consensual sex he saw fit. It is inconsistent for someone to fiercely resist government regulation of public corporations but assign it a role in regulating private behavior that doesn’t infringe on others’ civil rights.

However, although there is no moral basis for constraints on consensual sex, you shouldn’t abandon common sense or common courtesy. There are negative consequences to sex – most notably, pregnancy and disease – and there are psychological and emotional repercussions. As a society it behooves us to provide a source of information about sex to adults and teens so that they may make better and more informed choices, including the decision to not have sex. Something like Planned Parenthood for example.



Really? – 4/29/12 – Paul Ryan attacks the President; Rationing in the UK; Celebrating political purity at the expense of governance; Rainy London; Democrats are winning the bumper sticker war

April 30, 2012

Paul Ryan, author of the Republican budget plan, attacked the President for stripping $500 billion from Medicare; which is strange because his plan slashes Medicare even more. However, to justify his spartan budget he trots out that fairy story that the “magic of the marketplace” will somehow reduce expenditure without reducing coverage; that 50 million seniors, […]

Read the full article →

Really? – 4/28/12 – Election 2012; Presidential celebrations; Ron Paul’s pay; Student loans; Republican convention.

April 29, 2012

It is the first anniversary of the raid that killed bin-Laden and John McCain has taken the President to task for claiming, in a campaign ad, that Romney wouldn’t have had the nerve to order it – saying: “Barack Obama is not only trying to score political points by invoking Osama bin Laden, he is doing a […]

Read the full article →

Abortion is better unneeded than illegal.

April 27, 2012

The fight over abortion is unusual in that all parties in the dispute have one thing in common – all want fewer abortions. Obviously the abolitionists want there to be none, but even the most fervent supporters of abortion would happy if there were a need for fewer. As Bill Clinton said, abortion should be […]

Read the full article →

Election 2012 – 4/25/12 – The war on women redux; Mitt Romney – the perfect candidate

April 26, 2012

MORE WAR ON WOMEN When a Democratic strategist suggested that Anne Romney, as a stay at home mom, had never done a day of work in her life, the Republicans reacted with shock that anyone could think that managing a household was not hard work. They have since changed their minds. The Democrats introduced the […]

Read the full article →

Who will Romney pick as his running mate?

April 24, 2012

Now that everyone except Newt Gingrich knows that Romney is going to be the Republican Presidential candidate, speculation turns to who the Vice-Presidential candidate will be. It is a hard race to handicap. Four years ago who could honestly say they had heard of Sarah Palin before McCain picked her as his running mate. 12 Years ago […]

Read the full article →

The Death Penalty – Is it expensive, unfair and ineffective?

April 22, 2012

  THE EFFECT OF THE DEATH PENALTY ON THE MURDER RATE Proponents of the death penalty argue that it deters crime. To help us understand if that is an accurate claim, look at the following map: Immediately apparent is that the death penalty is regional; existing essentially throughout the country with the exception of the […]

Read the full article →

Republican Half-Truth on a CBO Report

April 21, 2012

A report released by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that tax hikes and spending cuts would hurt growth in the short term. But by shrinking deficits, it would help economic growth in the long run. Paul Ryan, the Republican budget brain, said in response: “CBO’s report confirms what millions of Americans already know from […]

Read the full article →

Election 2012 – Ron Paul picks the public’s pocket; Romney on immigration; Mormonism – no longer a sect? The dignity of work; Romney on equal pay; Romney and taxes

April 17, 2012

RON PAUL’S HYPOCRISY Although Romney will be the Republican nominee, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul are still running. Gingrich is a private citizen and is entitled to do whatever he wants, but Paul is collecting a salary – paid for by you and me – as a US Representative. Since last September 21st there have […]

Read the full article →