December 2017

The White House, congressional Republicans, and the gadflies of conservative media are trying to portray Robert Mueller’s investigation as ‘biased’. The latest to pile on is Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) — who suggests that Mueller is as bent as another favorite target of the right:

“I mean, if Bob Mueller were any more biased, we’d have to give him press credentials for the mainstream media,”  — Matt Gaetz

It’s a conservative twofer —  tying their boss’s nemesis to their favorite whipping boy. But let’s have a look at their claim of bias.

First, if I thought like a conservative, I would bring up Matt’s DUI arrest, the subsequent dismissal of the charges, and the fact that his dad was a prominent local politician — then I would let the innuendo fall where it may. But I don’t, so I won’t. And we’ll move on to the meat of the accusation.

The foundation of the bias charge is the discovery that some Mueller team members exchanged anti-Trump messages and that others made political donations to Democrats and Hillary Clinton.

The right-wing is in a tizzy over the revelation that FBI agent Peter Strzok exchanged anti-Trump texts during the 2016 campaign with another FBIer, Lisa Page, with whom he was having an affair. When the exchanges came to light in the summer of 2017, Mueller’s reaction was swift,

“Immediately upon learning of the allegations, the Special Counsel’s Office removed Peter Strzok from the investigation,”Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller, said in a statement. “Lisa Page completed her brief detail and had returned to the FBI weeks before our office was aware of the allegations.”

Strzok was assigned to HR. Which I assume is the FBI’s version of Purgatory.

(And let’s note the news of the Strzok/Page brouhaha was broken by the NY Times & WaPo — so shouldn’t the rabid right call it ‘fake news’?)

As for the campaign contributions, Greg Jarrett of Fox News reports that eight lawyers on Mueller’s team gave campaign donations to Democrats, including (I’m guessing ‘including’ — he’s unclear on the subject) five who donated to Hillary. Which is not as damning as it sounds when you consider that there are 52 people on Mueller’s team.

And I’m sure that some donated to Republicans, including Trump.

And what of Mueller himself? He served as a Marine in Vietnam. He was appointed acting deputy Attorney General during Bush Sr.’s administration. Later he was named FBI director by Bush Jr. And confirmed 98-0 by the Senate.

It’s not just that he had Republican and bipartisan credibility, he also garnered respect form the legal community when he faced down the White House in 2004.  John Ashcroft, AG at the time, was sick in hospital when the Bush administration tried to approach him to extend the NSA’s warrantless search program. Acting AG James Comey (yes, him) wouldn’t allow it, and Mueller backed him. Both threatened to resign, and the NSA program was modified.

Now Republicans are twisting that event to suggest that Mueller and Comey were bosom buddies – and that Mueller’s motivation is nothing more than revenge for Donald Trump firing his ‘friend’ as FBI Director.

Such is politics.

Leaving aside Mueller’s probity and the hysterical nature of Republican claims, how would Mueller be biased? He can’t make things up. I suppose he might ignore exculpatory evidence — but Trump, other possible defendants and the Republicans as a whole can afford the best lawyers. (Although looking at Trump’s team you wonder if the money is being well spent.)

Others claim Mueller is ignoring Hillary Clinton’s crimes. But whatever Hillary did or did not do has no bearing on what Trump and his campaign and then his administration did.

Also thrown into the mix is the claim that Mueller has exceeded the scope of his mandate. But he was given extensive liberty to pursue leads wherever they took him. Trump may like to say that investigation of his finances is off-limits, but he is wrong.

There has also been some huffing over whether Mueller’s team legally obtained some .gov email subpoenas. But any defendant has the right to address that, should he be indicted. Mueller is not judge and jury. Any claim of wrongdoing on Trump’s part would still need a House impeachment and Senate trial to result in any penalty to the President.

Other defendants would have the usual constitutional protections in a criminal procedure.

Further, Republican appointees lead the Dept of Justice and the FBI. They have steadfastly supported Mueller and see no evidence of bias or unprofessionalism.

Republicans control everything. The fact that they aren’t welcoming Mueller’s investigation as an opportunity to clear Trump’s ‘good’ name is telling. That they are instead squawking about the ‘deep state,’ and other imaginary cabals clearly points to a fear that Mueller is getting the goods. And some people are going to be found guilty of some stuff.


Be Careful, It’s Dumb Out There. A Few Stories from the Pit of Politics.

December 21, 2017

Sean Hannity is not known for an incisive intelligence. Which is probably an advantage in his line of work. It would hardly pay to be known for having brains when your stock in trade is to ridicule intelligence. But sometimes his idiocy is so ripe you have to pay attention. Such as in his tweet where he castigates NBC —  […]

Read the full article →

All Votes Count; Trump Assassination Paranoia; And Some Other Postcards from the Political Edge.

December 19, 2017

Yes Virginia, your vote does count. Before the November elections in Virginia, the House of Delegates (the lower house) was dominated by Republican representatives 66-34. After a stronger than anticipated performance in the election, the Democrats were within striking distance of ending up in a tie depending on the results of several recounts. And they […]

Read the full article →

Democrats Need to Speak Fighting Words. It’s Politics, not a Debate.

December 17, 2017

An old political joke has it that all liberal bumper stickers end with the same words — “continued on next bumper sticker”. Conservatives may not be right, but they are concise — and memorable. Who can forget “death panels”, “death taxes”. “job-killing” or, on a more optimistic note,  “job creators”? Now let’s look at how Democrats […]

Read the full article →

Is Eric Trump an Independent Misogynist or Just One Because His Father Is.

December 14, 2017

Donald Trump is a bully, and like every bully, he has his sycophants. He’s also a father and like any father his children give him the benefit of the doubt. Unfortunately for Trump, Don Jr. and Eric aren’t doing him any favors — and Ivanka seems to have melted away. Today it was Eric’s turn to take […]

Read the full article →

Gillibrand Doesn’t Need to Beg. Unlike Trump, She Wins the Popular Vote Easily.

December 12, 2017

By now Trump latest offensive tweet has made the rounds, and the clear sexist language disparaging Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand has been noted and scorned. Here’s the tweet: The “would do anything” is obvious sexual innuendo. But why should she do anything? Why should she beg? Unlike Trump, she wins her elections by huge margins in […]

Read the full article →

Moore Thinks the Constitution Goes too Far. (Or, What’s Wrong with Slavery? People Were Happy.)

December 11, 2017

In 2011, Roy Moore told a radio show getting rid of constitutional amendments after the Tenth Amendment would ‘eliminate many problems’. As a lawyer and an ‘on-again, off-again’ judge, Moore knows exactly what those amendments say. So let us have a look at what he objected to. Amendments fall into two categories – ones that extend rights, […]

Read the full article →

The Democrats Talked Tough on Franken and Let ‘Pussy-Grabber’ & the Pedophile Slide

December 7, 2017

Al Franken resigned. And he had to. There may be a debate about the relative seriousness of the various abuse claims. But the sheer number — now eight — made Franken’s position untenable. But the way the Democrats went about it was pathetic. They lost a man who had been good on women’s issues and got […]

Read the full article →

Trump Is a Character from A Greek Tragedy. Perhaps Icarus.

December 2, 2017

I have no expertise, training, or background in psychology. But that’s OK. For years conservatives have cast aspersions on knowledge – viewing it with suspicion. Now Trump has made expertise peripheral to advancement. God forbid that a job goes to someone who can do it. So, having established my credentials, let me offer my opinion of Donald Trump’s […]

Read the full article →